What do current proposals for an economic stimulus package propose? I’ve heard estimates of $600 – $800 for average American families. This “windfall,” in theory, will revitalize our consumer-based economy by filling malls with customers who are eager to spend, spend, spend. Perhaps the hope is that this “priming of the pump,” will once again get the streams of cash flow, flowing, and keep them flowing. This kind of stimulus measure however, clearly cannot keep consumers spending for long and it is reasonable to question how many will start spending at all. $800.00 after all, at least makes a dent in whatever astronomical figure the average American has for an outstanding credit card balance.

To really really get the economy going, how about not only a larger windfall to families, but an incentive for actually spending the money on new consumer goods. What if the government say, offered a matching tax credit to consumers of $1.00 for every $1.00 spent on soft goods and perhaps double that amount for durable goods? Wouldn’t that be sweet?

My gosh, why stop even there, why not actually pay people to go shopping? Can you imagine the amount of consumer spending that could be stimulated if the government would just pay us all to shop! They of course could not keep this up forever, maybe just for a year or two until we get over the hump and the bear goes back into hibernation.

Seriously though, what about something really radical like ending the drain on the economy by ending the war that has so far created over $40,000 in debt for every American family? What about some real leadership from our elected leaders to help transform this nation into a nation of savers instead of spenders, a nation of thoughtful investors rather than reckless consumers, and a nation of well-rounded, productive people rather than amusement junkies? A one-shot, injection of liquidity may have psychological value but it won’t change the fundamentals, a long term plan and real leadership is needed for that.

Angry Bear phrased it well, “we must think further than just giving the junkie one more–maybe his last–shot in the arm. In short, merely priming the consumer for one more run at the punch bowl is a bit short-sighted.”